Non-Centrist Teachers Have Their Place, Too

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

It’s about time that a reformer finally pays proper attention to what actually happens in the classroom (" 'Hugging the Middle': Why Good Teaching Ignores Ideology," Commentary, April 29, 2009). By analyzing nearly 10,000 lesson plans created between the 1890s and 2005 in urban, suburban, and rural schools, Larry Cuban immediately establishes credibility at a time when so much is written by theoreticians.

One caveat, however, needs to be kept in mind. Although most teachers fall somewhere in the middle between the polar extremes of purist traditional and progressive teaching, as Mr. Cuban explains, those at the far ends also meet the needs and interests of some students. That observation should come as no surprise, since public schools are required by law to enroll nearly all who show up at their doors.

Private and religious schools are an entirely different matter, because parents choose to enroll their children in them based on their specific philosophies. As a result, these schools have the luxury of designing curricula and regulations of their own that appeal to small segments of the student population.

Walt Gardner
Los Angeles, Calif.

Vol. 28, Issue 31, Page 31

Published in Print: May 13, 2009, as Non-Centrist Teachers Have Their Place, Too
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories