For Effective Peer Review, Teachers' Input Must Count

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Jennifer Goldstein is right about the need for peer review to improve instructional quality ("Union Bashing Won’t Reform Our Schools," Commentary, March 11, 2009). But she omits two factors that are essential for the process to work fairly.

First, the designated coaches must be certified in the field of the teachers they are rating, or their judgment can be rightly called into question. A teacher who is not licensed in Spanish, for example, is not qualified to rate instruction in that subject.

Second, the final judgment of the oversight panel must give overwhelming weight to the input of peers, as opposed to that of the principal. Unless the stipulation is agreed to beforehand, some principals will readily concede, while others will stubbornly resist yielding power.

Walt Gardner
Los Angeles, Calif.

Vol. 28, Issue 27, Page 29

Published in Print: April 1, 2009, as For Effective Peer Review, Teachers’ Input Must Count
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories