Increasing the Scope of 'Value Added' Approaches

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

"Salvaging Accountability" by Thomas Toch and Douglas N. Harris (Commentary, Oct. 1, 2008) speaks to the faulty premises of the No Child Left Behind Act as a school accountability measure. The chief problem is schools’ responsibility for outcome determinants over which they have no control, including physical, mental, and emotional characteristics, as well as experiential histories.

“Value added” approaches are far more sensible than absolute standards. Those approaches must recognize, however, that student characteristics and experiences are a continuing influence on achievement, rather than being limited to the past. They must be accounted for in value-added programs as well for them to be rational.

Tom Morris
Orlando, Fla.

Vol. 28, Issue 11, Page 27

Published in Print: November 5, 2008, as Increasing the Scope of 'Value Added' Approaches
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories