Nation at Risk Assumptions Are Not Necessarily Today's

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

In recalling the contributions of the 1983 report A Nation at Risk ("A Nation at Risk: 25 Years Later," Sept. 24, 2008), we should not forget that its authors had not bought in to the current assumption of standards reformers that secondary education is solely a preparation for college. The report stated: “We must emphasize that the variety of student aspirations, abilities, and preparations requires that appropriate content be available to satisfy diverse needs.” This statement would be dismissed by current reformers as “the soft bigotry of low expectations.”

There are dangers in the assumptions about student abilities adopted by reformers in the 1980s, and there are dangers in the assumptions of current reformers. An honest exploration of these assumptions would help us in formulating educational policy.

William A. Proefriedt
Professor Emeritus
City University of New York Queens College
Flushing, N.Y.

Vol. 28, Issue 09, Page 31

Published in Print: October 22, 2008, as Nation at Risk Assumptions Are Not Necessarily Today's
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories