Letter

The Self-Interested Tactics of Some Advocacy Groups

October 14, 2008

To the Editor:

Regarding your Sept. 17, 2008, front-page story “In Advocacy Realm, Specific Disabilities Gain in Prominence”:

Advocacy groups for many of the new “specific disabilities” are using the mantle of genetic authority to justify questionable expenditures of public money toward supports for so-called disabilities that belong in the realm of private health care. Several of these new groups seem more like jobs programs for nongovernmental-organization careerists and unemployed mental-health professionals than useful extensions of U.S. education or medical policy.

Public education, in particular, should not be used as the back door through which all manner of noneducational programs can be funded out of scrutiny of the legislative process. The fact that these special-interest groups and their guiding lights in academia are using such methods speaks volumes about their intent.

Alan Hull

Conyers, Ga.

Vol. 28, Issue 08, Page 34

Published in Print: October 15, 2008, as The Self-Interested Tactics of Some Advocacy Groups

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

The Self-Interested Tactics of Some Advocacy Groups

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

The Self-Interested Tactics of Some Advocacy Groups

Get more stories and free e-newsletters!

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Whitepapers