Report Roundup

Advanced Placement

"Racial Differences in the Impact of Participating in Advanced Placement Programs on Educational and Labor-Market Outcomes"

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Students who participated in the Advanced Placement program were more likely to score higher on college-entrance exams, earn college degrees, and make more money after college than non-AP students, but those differences varied significantly among various racial and ethnic groups, a new study says.

The study, to be published in the next issue of the journal Educational Foundations, looked at data from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 and periodic followups, the last of which was in 2000.

African-American and Hispanic students who participated in the AP program, which is owned by the New York City-based College Board, scored more than 100 points higher on composite scores on the PSAT, SAT, and ACT than students who had not participated in the AP program, according to the study, conducted by Lamont A. Flowers, a professor of educational leadership at Clemson University in Clemson, S.C.

Among students identified as Asian or Pacific Islander, AP participants scored 263 points higher than nonparticipants; among white students, that gap was 174 points. Similar gaps also appeared among the racial and ethnic groups with regard to college grade point averages, postsecondary attainment, and postbaccalaureate wages.

Vol. 28, Issue 07, Page 5

Published in Print: October 8, 2008, as Advanced Placement
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >