Would 'Neovouchers' Survive if Voters Had Their Say?

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Kevin G. Welner’s Commentary on “neovouchers” (or tuition tax credits) for nonpublic schools was right on target ("Under the Voucher Radar," Sept. 3, 2008). To it could be added that not only have millions of voters in 26 statewide referendums rejected vouchers or their variants by an average of 2-to-1, but that five of these states specifically have rejected tuition tax credits: Nebraska, in 1970 (57 percent against the credits to 43 percent for); the District of Columbia, 1981 (89 percent to 11 percent); Utah, 1988 (70 percent to 30 percent); Oregon, 1990 (67 percent to 33 percent); and Colorado, 1998 (60 percent to 40 percent).

Who can doubt that if voters in those states permitting neovouchers—Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island—had been allowed to vote on these programs, they too would have rejected them? It might also be noted that the constitutions of all six of these states contain at least implied prohibitions of vouchers and neovouchers.

Edd Doerr
Americans for Religious Liberty
Silver Spring, Md.

Vol. 28, Issue 05, Pages 30-31

Published in Print: September 24, 2008, as Would 'Neovouchers' Survive If Voters Had Their Say?
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories