Use Performance Pay in Sweatshops, Not Schools

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

The ProComp merit-pay structure set up between the Denver teachers’ union and the city’s school district is in “ferment” because nowhere does research show that it has had any real, positive impact (“Model Plan of Merit Pay in Ferment,” July 30, 2008). Merit-pay plans are established because they sound simple to people who just want their schools or kids to do better, and because politicians will say or do anything to look good, especially when they really can’t be proved wrong. All a politician has to say, when merit pay does not work, is that it was applied incorrectly, or that the union sabotaged it.

Unions are so petrified of bad press that they accept merit pay instead of saying what it really is: a scam. It’s effective only for people like my mother, who worked in a sweatshop sewing buttons on dresses; the more buttons she sewed, the more pennies she made. That is merit pay.

If performance-based pay is so great for teachers, why not offer it to other professionals? When a doctor is going to do surgery, we could tell him that if he does a better job on that broken leg, we’ll pay him more. Or tell a fireman that if he rescues us better, he will get a bonus.

Elliot Kotler
Ossining, N.Y.

Vol. 28, Issue 01, Page 29

Published in Print: August 27, 2008, as Use Performance Pay in Sweatshops, Not Schools
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories