Tracing Math’s Teaching Woes to ‘Over-the-Hill Academics’

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

A major factor contributing to America’s mathematics education malaise is an aging and hoary mathematics education professoriate and its symbiotic relationship with education research funding (“Essential Qualities of Math Teaching Remain Unknown,” April 2, 2008).

Thanks to the revolving-door “peer review” system of the U.S. Department of Education, the National Science Foundation, and other such agencies, these over-the-hill academics can engage in a back-scratching reciprocity with their peers to fund pet projects, keep graduate students employed, and almost anything else except improving the quality of teaching and learning in America’s public school classrooms.

Private agencies have been similarly hoodwinked by these charlatans.

The sooner the U.S. public education system and its higher education counterpart put an end to teacher tenure and to a peer-review culture that has no interest in “solutions,” the sooner some real progress will be made in improving mathematical literacy for both students and teachers.

Alan Hull
Conyers, Ga.

Vol. 27, Issue 35, Page 31

Published in Print: April 30, 2008, as Tracing Math’s Teaching Woes To ‘Over-the-Hill Academics’
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories