Clearing Up Possible Confusion About Urban Debate Leagues

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Your article “Leagues Revive Debate in City Schools” (April 16, 2008) mischaracterizes the work of the National Association for Urban Debate Leagues, or NAUDL, and the Associated Leaders of Urban Debate, or ALOUD, in the statement, “While [ALOUD] helps fit debate into schools several ways, [NAUDL] has embraced a public-private-partnership model that has enabled Chicago and Baltimore to grow into powerhouse leagues.”

Baltimore’s model is not the model used by NAUDL. The Baltimore Urban Debate League is a 501(c)(3) organization that administers the city’s urban debate program. The support that it enjoys from the leadership of Baltimore’s schools reflects years of relationship-building and the alignment of debate with objectives. The group’s success—a 2006 Coming Up Taller Award from the President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, and a feature on the television program “60 Minutes”—mirrors ALOUD’s proven methods 100 percent.

The use of public-private partnerships is not unique to NAUDL. ALOUD relies on such partnerships. The actual difference is that ALOUD works flexibly with partner programs to identify those best positioned to sustain debate in a city.

Stakeholders have differing needs and capacities. If we believe debate helps kids, it is imperative to examine how we embrace debate in each community. Flexibility has led to success in Seattle, Atlanta, New York City, and elsewhere, with universities and nonprofits playing central roles. ALOUD has helped Baltimore develop media strategies, fund development, and evaluate methods.

The confusion regarding Baltimore’s organization may stem from references to our program on the NAUDL Web site. We will work to correct elements that might be misleading about our history.

ALOUD’s board, led by New York University President John Sexton, and of which I am a member, includes political commentator Robert Shrum, former Baltimore superintendent Bonnie Copeland, and corporate leaders from Pitney Bowes, MTV, and Textron Inc. That leadership, plus 20 years of experience creating successful debate initiatives for at-risk youths, excites us about prospects for serving new and existing urban debate communities.

As we expand, we encourage stakeholders to visit www.debateleaders.org to learn what debate does for children.

Pam Spiliadis
Executive Director
Baltimore Urban Debate League
Baltimore, Md.

Vol. 27, Issue 35, Page 31

Published in Print: April 30, 2008, as Clearing Up Possible Confusion About Urban Debate Leagues
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories