Those Evaluating Teachers Should Teach in Their Field

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

Thomas Toch’s plan to strengthen evaluation of teachers is an improvement over the methods currently in use in most schools, but it overlooks one crucial element (“Test Results and Drive-By Evaluations,” Commentary, March 5, 2008). It is vital that those doing the actual class observations be certified in the same field as the teacher being scrutinized.

Even under Mr. Toch’s proposal, it would be altogether possible to have repeated visits by multiple evaluators who knew little or nothing about the subject taught. In foreign languages, for example, would these same observers know the difference between, say, ser and estar, the very different “to be” verbs in Spanish?

The point is that for too long in K-12 we’ve assumed that expertise in subject matter is secondary to pedagogy. That would never occur in higher education, where peer review is the accepted method of assessment. If we expect to improve educational outcomes, we need to reconsider our current strategies.

Walt Gardner
Los Angeles, Calif.

Vol. 27, Issue 28, Page 27

Published in Print: March 19, 2008, as Those Evaluating Teachers Should Teach in Their Field
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories