Report Roundup

Analysis Defends 'Reading First'

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Too Good to Last: The True Story About Reading First

The controversy surrounding the implementation of the federal Reading First program—which led to a series of audits and investigations and a slashing of its budget—was more the result of political games and unsubstantiated complaints by “aggrieved vendors” than any wrongdoing, concludes a paperRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader by Sol Stern, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a New York City-based think tank.

Many of the problems the program faced in ensuring grantees followed its strict requirements resulted from a softening of the original policy language, the political savvy of publishers who did not reap the financial benefits they had anticipated from the $1 billion-a-year initiative, and a media frenzy around a series of highly critical reports by the U.S. Department of Education’s inspector general, Mr. Stern says.

The inspector general concluded that federal officials and contractors involved with the program appeared to favor certain commercial texts and tests and to have financial conflicts associated with those products.

See Also
For background, previous stories, and Web links, read Reading.

Vol. 27, Issue 27, Page 5

Published in Print: March 12, 2008, as Analysis Defends 'Reading First'
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories