Dialects, Spelling Bees, and a Phonetic Alphabet

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

To the Editor:

American orthography is, to put it charitably, dysfunctional. Whatever the dialect, neither alphabet nor spelling conforms to our speech. Yet, educators insist on perpetuating these incongruities.

Take as an example spelling bees. Students are rewarded for memorizing arcane patterns of letters only obliquely related to the words they purport to represent. Incredible.

Consider the countless hours already wasted by students in learning an antiquated alphabet in the service of a lunatic orthography. How much useful knowledge could have been acquired instead? And what scholastic advances have been delayed?

My complaint is hardly novel. No less an American than Benjamin Franklin despaired over our “system” of spelling and devised a phonetic alphabet. As I see it, the challenge lies not in creating a phonetic alphabet—there are such aplenty—but in selecting and promoting one.

I urge educators to assess the present plight of American orthography, devise a practical means of transitioning to a phonetic alphabet of choice, and then broadcast their conclusions and implement their recommendations.

Committee, anyone?

Paul Starbuck
Perry, Okla.

Vol. 27, Issue 26, Page 31

Published in Print: March 5, 2008, as Dialects, Spelling Bees, and a Phonetic Alphabet
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories