Science in India and China: How to Compare Teaching?

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

In her Commentary "Closing the Science Gap by Hand" (Feb. 6, 2008), Anne Spence undermines her intuitively appealing case by omitting the results of the annual Intel Science Talent Search, which judges individual student research. Six finalists from what was originally called the Westinghouse Science Talent Search when it began in 1942 have gone on to win Nobel Prizes in physics and chemistry. This record calls into question her argument that students need hands-on instruction in order to maximize learning.

Ms. Spence then cites the potential threat from students in India and China to try to justify her position. But neither country has ever taken part in any test of international competition that measures science and math. As a result, there is no way of knowing how well students from these two countries are being taught in the sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics, the STEM subjects. They may be receiving stellar instruction, but until the evidence is available, it is impossible to know.

Walt Gardner
Los Angeles, Calif.

Vol. 27, Issue 24, Page 30

Published in Print: February 20, 2008, as Science in India and China: How to Compare Teaching?
Related Stories

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories