Letter

No One Has a Patent on Defining ‘Accountability’

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

In response to "Critics of NCLB Ask Congress to Overhaul It" (Feb. 28, 2007):

The members of the Forum on Educational Accountability have it right on the best ways to assess schools and improve student learning; Michael J. Petrilli of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation is wrong in contradicting their ideas. No one has a patent on defining the word “accountability.”

Democracy was invented a long time ago as a way of holding those who govern accountable to the governed. In “accounting” to the people, one needs to provide a much richer and deeper look than the No Child Left Behind Act now provides us. Then, what is needed are processes that allow the people to speak up and “vote the rascals out.”

Decisions made farther and farther away from the very people who know each school best make it harder and harder to democratically intervene. The more centralized the decisionmaking is, the more shallow the evidence used for making decisions is and the more standardized the solutions become. This is hardly unique to K-12 schooling; it’s the excuse, after all, for why large universities rely so heavily on SAT and ACT scores. They know that’s an inaccurate and unreliable method, but it’s a cheap and quick way to sort a lot of data. That’s a rough metaphor for what we’ve turned K-12 schooling into: a shallow data-collection course.

Bravo for the many organizations that have gotten together to offer us another way to look at what accountability can mean. As John Merrow puts it in his recent Commentary, “It’s painful to note that the No Child Left Behind Act has been responsible for increasing the ‘soft bigotry’ that the bipartisan coalition [that passed it] hoped the law would eliminate” ("A ‘Surge’ Strategy for No Child Left Behind?" Feb. 14, 2007). The fault, Mr. Merrow reminds us, lies largely with “our miserly, backward-thinking approach to testing and assessment.”

It’s time to move forward. It’s all about making democracy work—above all, in the one institution designed (we would hope) to educate on behalf of democracy.

Deborah Meier
Senior Scholar
Steinhardt School of Education
New York University
New York, N.Y.

Vol. 26, Issue 27, Page 36

Published in Print: March 14, 2007, as No One Has a Patent on Defining ‘Accountability’
Related Stories

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Dyslexia: How to Identify Warning Signs at Every Grade

Increased Social Connectedness Through Digital Peer Learning

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >