Letter

In Science, We Need Both Technical Literacy, Ph.D.s

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

In his Commentary "The Democratization of Scientific Knowledge" (Feb. 7, 2007), Dennis M. Bartels argues that our national scientific priority should be developing universal technical literacy, not increasing the number of Ph.D.s in science and engineering.

In fact, these are complementary goals, and both are critical to enlarging the pool of technically competent Americans in order to enhance U.S. competitiveness in the 21st-century global economy.

We must expand the pipeline for science, technology, engineering, and math (or STEM) fields to develop a long-term supply of talent. We must encourage students, especially from underrepresented groups, to pursue STEM education at all levels. But we need also to increase both the breadth and depth of Americans’ scientific knowledge.

The issue is not just a numbers race, although the United States until recently produced more Ph.D.s than any other region of the world. It is about having a highly skilled workforce.

Doctoral education trains students to become scientists, engineers, mathematicians, and experts in a wide variety of fields. It is where our nation’s future leaders develop the ability to do original research and to identify and solve complex problems—skills required to advance the limits of knowledge. America’s competitors understand the relationship between human talent, research expertise, and economic leadership, and are expanding their own graduate programs accordingly.

Increasing the number of Ph.D.s in these fields must be a crucial component of our nation’s overall competitiveness strategy. If we are to maintain our global economic strength and national security, we must both develop our domestic talent pool and produce a highly trained workforce able to create and innovate.

Debra W. Stewart
President
Council of Graduate Schools
Washington, D.C.

Vol. 26, Issue 24, Page 37

Published in Print: February 21, 2007, as In Science, We Need Both Technical Literacy, Ph.D.s
Related Stories

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >