Members of Two Minds Over Union Leader In D.C.

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Members of the Washington Teachers’ Union, another local union that is trying to rebuild following a leadership scandal, express mixed feelings about President George Parker, who has been leading the organization since 2005.

While some members of the District of Columbia union give Mr. Parker points for reaching out and giving them a greater voice in union issues, others say attempts to gain access to some financial information have been blocked repeatedly.

Financial transparency is important to WTU members. Former President Barbara A. Bullock was sent to prison for masterminding a scam, along with two of her aides, to embezzle more than $4.5 million from the union. Ms. Bullock used the money to buy herself furs and jewelry, among other luxuries.

The American Federation of Teachers took over the union in 2003, installing an administrator, the late George Springer. The union returned to local control when Mr. Parker was elected.

See Also
Read the accompanying story, “Unrest Besets Scandal-Scarred Dade Union”

Since then, there has been some change in the right direction, members say. A new contract was negotiated last year, and the union now has a representative assembly that met for the first time in September.

But membership is at a low point. The union has 4,400 members; in 2003—a year after the scandal broke—there were 5,000.

“The practice of having a representative assembly, in which all schools are represented in proportion to the size of their union memberships, with monthly meetings, has helped to open up the lines of communication,” said Robert Zugby, a teacher and building representative at Wilson High School.

Mr. Parker also keeps in touch with members through frequent automated telephone messages and e-mail, he added.

‘Still in Dark’

Mr. Parker last year negotiated with the 58,000-student District of Columbia school district a contract retroactive to 2004. The agreement includes performance pay for teachers at some schools, and increases starting pay for teachers from $39,000 to $42,500 a year. The salary for teachers at the top of the scale would rise from $75,000 to $87,000 over three years.

But some teachers were upset because the contract added a half-hour to each day for planning and four additional days for training.

“Many of the teachers did not realize that was in the contract until much later,” said Laureen Smith-Butler, a teacher at Spingarn High School.

Ms. Smith-Butler also faulted the union for stalling for several months last year when she and other members asked for financial information dating back to Mr. Springer’s days.

“We are still in the dark about money issues,” she said, adding that officials have so far failed to give them answers on financial questions they have raised.

Mr. Parker did not keep several interview appointments with Education Week and could not be reached for comment before deadline.

Still, some members credit Mr. Parker with being accessible to them.

“He is good at communications, meeting with us, keeping us abreast of what’s going on,” said Tanya Copeland, a teacher at Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary School.

Mr. Zugby pointed to other provisions in the contract that have been helpful to teachers, such as the creation of professional-development committees and provisions that call for more schools that would experiment with approaches to provide education—although that latter project, Mr. Zugby wrote in an e-mail, is yet to take off.

“Of course, there is still room for improvement, and the leadership is too new in office to be certain that these trends will continue,” he said, “but the prognosis at this point seems to be promising.”

Vol. 26, Issue 23, Pages 12-13

Published in Print: February 14, 2007, as Members of Two Minds Over Union Leader in D.C.
Web Resources
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >