
Letter
Studies With ‘Qualifiers,’ Confusion on Goals
To the Editor:
There are two important aspects of your Jan. 10, 2007, article "Study Links Merit Pay to Slightly Higher Student Scores" that deserve more scrutiny.
First, what is meant, in the headline and elsewhere, by the word “slightly”? Is there a significant statistical difference? Too many studies are being produced today with such qualifiers, which offer little help in interpreting study data.
Second, and more importantly, a professor of education policy studies, commenting on the report, is quoted in the article as saying: “Accountability systems and incentives will almost certainly make test scores go up. What we don’t know in the long run is whether students are learning more.” What a telling comment!
I have long predicted that the day would come when students passed the mandated tests and schools got a performing label, yet the nation’s children and graduates were not truly educated. Should our goal not be long-term learning and retention, as opposed to short-term test results?
Vol. 26, Issue 21, Page 35
Get more stories and free e-newsletters!
Viewed
Emailed
Recommended
Commented
Sponsor Insights
5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech
Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom
All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™
Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics
Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide
Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches
SEE MORE Insights >
- ESE Teacher
- Duval County Public Schools, Jacksonville, Florida
- Executive Director
- Tarrant To and Through Partnership (T3), Fort Worth, Texas
- PRINCIPAL
- Essex Westford School District, Essex Junction, VT, US
- Special Education Teacher
- Greenwich Education Group, Stamford, Connecticut
- 2019-2020 School Psychologist
- Newport News Public Schools, Newport News, VA, US