Letter

Let Systemic Changes Replace NCLB Sanctions

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

Many observers have noted that the farther you get from the classroom, the stronger the support for the No Child Left Behind Act becomes. Nonetheless, it is disheartening to see political proposals from on high that are more likely to worsen than solve the federal law’s many flaws.

For example, experienced teachers say that the central problem with No Child Left Behind-mandated testing is not the varying state standards, but that it forces “teaching to the test” and results in a narrowed curriculum. New proposals for a national exam, like the congressionally rejected schemes offered by the previous two presidents, and like No Child Left Behind itself, are yet another magic bullet that will not address root causes of learning difficulties. That will require sustained school improvements with the resources to match. For real improvement, high-quality, teacher-led assessment is what is really useful, not annual standardized tests.

Moreover, treating the National Assessment of Educational Progress as the gold standard would be a terrible mistake. First, like most state tests, NAEP exams are only limited measures of what students ought to be learning. Second, researchers from the National Academy of Sciences and the Government Accountability Office, among many others, have found the NAEP proficiency levels to be flawed and inappropriately difficult. NAEP should not become, by mandate or inducement, the national accountability test.

Rather than promote unsound testing schemes, Congress should heed the advice of the 100 organizations that have endorsed the “Joint Organizational Statement on No Child Left Behind.” That statement calls for a “shift from applying sanctions for failing to raise test scores to holding states and localities accountable for making the systemic changes that improve student achievement.” The full statement can be found on the Forum on Educational Accountability’s Web site (www.edaccountability.org) and on the FairTest Web site (www.fairtest.org).

Monty Neill
Executive Director
National Center for Fair & Open Testing
(FairTest)
Cambridge, Mass.

Vol. 26, Issue 20, Page 41

Published in Print: January 24, 2007, as Let Systemic Changes Replace NCLB Sanctions
Related Stories

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >