Letter

‘Reading First’ Program Is Not About ‘Cashing In’

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

Education Week has stoked the scrutiny of Reading First into a major “scandal.” Both the news article "Reading Law Fails to Bring Innovations" (Dec. 13, 2006) and the Commentary by Marc Dean Millot, "‘Reading First-gate’" (Dec. 20, 2006) focus on the economics of Reading First. This so-called scandal continues to grow on misinformation. Even well-intentioned observers now condemn the program’s implementation based on hearsay.

Bring this controversy back to reality:

• The assessment by the U.S. Department of Education’s inspector general was prompted by publishers who have not benefited from Reading First’s six-year, $6 billion budget.

• Congress’ mandate was to implement instructional methods and materials with a scientifically researched foundation.

• The National Expert Review Panel for Reading First was “stacked” with experts in the area of scientific reading research, as mandated.

• The inspector general’s report specifically stated that Reading First managers avoided any economic conflicts of interest.

• Instructional materials to support the mandate of Reading First were rare when states’ proposals were submitted. Publishing an “innovative” core reading program takes years and a great deal of capital. These are only beginning to emerge.

• Although both the review panel and Reading First’s managers avoided making specific recommendations about materials, states’ proposals that included instructional methods or materials with no scientific research foundation had to be rejected in accordance with Congress’ mandate.

• Certain commercial programs that have solid evidence of effectiveness, one of which was a complainant prompting the inspector general’s investigation, were not widely selected. The inspector general’s report found no evidence that these programs were either promoted or discouraged by the National Expert Review Panel or the managers of Reading First.

Reading First is not about cashing in. Preliminary data suggest that the program is working. The scandal of Reading First may be that programs that are ideologically based, rather than scientifically based, may get a cut of the $6 billion, regardless of Congress’ intent and in disservice to the children being served.

Robert P. Marino
Baltimore, Md.


The writer was a member of the National Expert Review Panel for Reading First.

Vol. 26, Issue 18, Page 31

Published in Print: January 10, 2007, as ‘Reading First’ Program Is Not About ‘Cashing In’
Related Stories

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >