Letter

Safe-Schools Funding Cut Is Seen as ‘Inexcusable’

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

To the Editor:

I am shocked and dismayed by the proposed elimination of the $345.5 million federal Safe and Drug Free Schools and Communities program in President Bush’s 2007 budget ("Drug-Free-Schools Grants Targeted by Bush," March 1, 2006).

This comes on the heels of Congress’ slashing 20 percent (more than $90 million) of the program’s funding in the 2006 budget. The U.S. Department of Education projects that its already poorly funded school emergency-planning grants will drop from $30 million last fiscal year to $24 million in 2006.

My organization has tracked at least 19 school-associated violent deaths since August of 2005. These deaths totaled 39 last year, following a jump to 49 in the 2003-04 school year. There were 17 and 16, respectively, in the two prior school years.

We have also identified 72 nonfatal school-related shooting incidents already this school year, with months remaining before its end. We tracked 52 nonfatal shootings last year, and 68 the school year before that.

A recently released University of Arkansas study, with surveys of more than 2,100 school superintendents, also found that schools’ disaster-preparedness measures are sorely lacking.

William Modzeleski, a top Education Department official in the office of safe and drug-free schools, is quoted in your article as saying about the funding: “If it’s not being used effectively and wisely, … it doesn’t matter how much it is.” Since his office has overseen the program for more than a decade, perhaps it should be the first point of scrutiny if the funds have not been wisely and effectively monitored and spent.

As Congress pumps more money into protecting bridges, monuments, and its own office buildings, it is inexcusable for it to cut funding to protect students and teachers.

When the next school massacre occurs, or worse, if terrorism comes to the schoolhouse door, Congress and the administration need only look in the mirror when they start asking, “How did this ever happen?”

Kenneth S. Trump
President
National School Safety and
Security Services
Cleveland, Ohio

Vol. 25, Issue 28, Pages 34, 36

Published in Print: March 22, 2006, as Safe-Schools Funding Cut Is Seen as ‘Inexcusable’

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >