High Court Rejects Case on Title IX

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The U.S. Supreme Court last week let stand an appellate-court decision throwing out a lawsuit that blamed the Department of Education’s rules against sex discrimination for cuts to men’s college-sports teams that allegedly were unfair to male athletes.

A federal appeals court in Washington last year ruled against a coalition led by the National Wrestling Coaches Association that had challenged some of the Education Department’s rules for enforcing Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972.

In a 2-1 ruling in May 2004, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the disputed rules were not directly to blame for cuts to men’s teams in various sports, chiefly wrestling, at colleges since the 1980s.

Instead, the coaches’ real beef should be with those institutions, which the appeals court said have flexibility in how to comply with the regulations. ("Wrestling Coaches Lose Appeal Over Ed. Dept.’s Title IX Rules," May 26, 2004.)

On June 6, the Supreme Court declined without comment to take up the plaintiffs’ appeal in National Wrestling Coaches Association v. Department of Education (Case No. 04-922).

“They don’t reverse every case that’s decided in error,” said Lawrence J. Joseph, a Washington lawyer representing the plaintiffs.

But the National Women’s Law Center, which backed the federal government’s position, said it hoped the high court’s action meant that the “last word on this case has been spoken.”

“It’s high time the wrestlers stopped using this important law as a scapegoat for their own problems,” said Marcia D. Greenberger, the co-president of the Washington-based center.

Rematch Coming?

But Mr. Joseph said the plaintiffs were not giving up. He said they have another case pending against the Education Department over the agency’s rejection of a formal request to revise the Title IX rules.

In addition to the original coaches and alumni groups, that second case includes some new plaintiffs, including a high school wrestling club from Pennsylvania.

The association’s first suit challenged Education Department’s 1979 and 1996 guidance on Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination in education programs receiving federal funds.

The rules allow colleges to prove compliance by providing athletic opportunities for men and women in numbers proportionate to their enrollments, among other steps. Institutions can eliminate teams or limit their rosters to achieve such balance under the rules.

Vol. 24, Issue 40, Page 22

Published in Print: June 15, 2005, as High Court Rejects Case on Title IX
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >