Take Note

Artistic Differences

Milwaukee Board Fights to Regain Paintings

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
This 1927 painting by Birger Sandzen,
This 1927 painting by Birger Sandzen, "A Mountain Symphony," was a gift to a Milwaukee school
—Courtesy of Shannon's Fine Art Auctioneers

The Milwaukee school district is in a legal battle with a Connecticut auction house over valuable paintings that a principal wanted to sell.

Principal Nancy H. Conner of Washington High School in Milwaukee signed a contract with Shannon’s Fine Art Auctioneers in Woodbridge, Conn., last September to sell two paintings without the school board’s approval, said Patrick B. McDonnell, the deputy city attorney who is working on the legal matter.

The mountain-landscape paintings by the Swedish artist Birger Sandzen, which were discovered in the school’s storage area, were a gift from the 1927 graduating class. The two paintings are worth nearly $250,000 each.

Before signing the contract, Ms. Conner spoke with the school council, an independent advisory board of parents, teachers, and community members for Washington High, about selling the paintings and received permission to sell them from auditors for the school district, said Clara Henley, the president of the school council.

But Mr. McDonnell said the principal violated school board policy. All gifts made to the Milwaukee schools fall under the district board’s authority, he said.

The auction house filed a lawsuit on March 30 in Connecticut Superior Court against the principal and the Milwaukee district, arguing that it has a right to sell the paintings.

The 105,000-student Milwaukee district filed a countersuit against the art auction house on April 8, seeking to keep the paintings.

Shannon’s has refused to return the artwork, but it has withdrawn the paintings from the April 28 auction. The auction house is now seeking $136,000 in damages from the district, including a $105,000 fee for removing the paintings from the scheduled auction, according to its lawsuit.

Ms. Henley is angry over losing the potential money for the school.

“That’s why I’m so mad about it, because it’s telling me the school board doesn’t care about the kids, because they’re cutting the budget,” she said.

Vol. 24, Issue 33, Page 3

Published in Print: April 27, 2005, as Artistic Differences

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >