States Get Guidance on Title I Aid to Districts

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The Department of Education has sent a letter to chief state school officers clarifying their use of Title I money for schools and districts identified as needing improvement under the No Child Left Behind Act.

The Oct. 12 letter from Jacquelyn C. Jackson, the department’s director of student achievement and school accountability programs, addresses several concerns raised by states. One of the primary questions is whether states can allocate school improvement funds under the law to a district identified as needing improvement if no individual schools in the district are in that category.

The issue has come up because as test scores are aggregated up to the district level, subgroups of students—such as those with disabilities—that were too small to count for determining adequate yearly progress for individual schools may count for the school system as a whole.

States must reserve 4 percent of their federal Title I aid for school improvement activities and allocate not less than 95 percent of that amount directly to districts.

Based on the department’s interpretation of the law, Ms. Jackson wrote, states should not initially allocate school improvement money to districts that do not have schools deemed in need of improvement. But if excess money remains after such schools have been served, the money could be given to districts based on need. “Certainly a state could determine that [districts] identified for improvement have a bona fide need,” she wrote.

The department provided more flexibility in how districts may use Title I funds set aside for professional development. Districts must set aside 10 percent of their Title I dollars for that purpose. Ms. Jackson said that money can be spent for teachers throughout the district, not just at schools in need of improvement.

She also said that states can set their own guidelines for applying the law’s rewards and sanctions to schools that do not consistently receive Title I aid from one year to the next. States are required to apply the strict consequences spelled out in the law only to schools receiving Title I funds.

Vol. 24, Issue 09, Page 32

Published in Print: October 27, 2004, as States Get Guidance on Title I Aid to Districts
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >