Senate Panel OKs Voc. Ed. Reauthorization

Some Measures Sought by President Bush Not Part of Committee Bill

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The Senate education committee last week unanimously approved a bill to reauthorize the main federal vocational education law, but its prospects for final passage remain uncertain.

Several key differences remain between the House and Senate bills for renewing the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act of 1998, which is set to expire this year.

"Given the hang-ups we’ve had with other bills in similar circumstances, it is difficult to predict" whether work on the bill will be finished this year, said Gayle Osterberg, a spokeswoman for Republicans on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee.

Measures to reauthorize the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, the Head Start program, and the Higher Education Act have also languished in the current Congress, although the IDEA bill made progress last week. ("IDEA Reauthorization Gets Boost as House, Senate Plan Discussions," this issue.)

"This legislation will help provide more benefits to people who need jobs or want better jobs by creating better pathways for academic and vocational skills enhancement," said Sen. Michael B. Enzi, R-Wyo., a co-sponsor of the bill.

The Senate version of the vocational education bill does not include some controversial proposals put forward by President Bush earlier this year. In May, the president proposed a series of overhauls to the vocational program, including the replacement of two existing streams of federal funding with a single program for distributing the money, to be called the Secondary and Technical Education Excellence Program. ("Bush Plan Calls for More Rigor in Vocational Education," June 9, 2004.)

Advocacy groups worried that the result would be a cut to the $1.3 billion program, said Christin M. Driscoll, the senior director of public policy for the Association for Career and Technical Education, in Alexandria, Va. The Senate bill would keep the two current sources of federal vocational funding, state grants and Tech Prep, separate.

"By and large the committee chose to keep the structural integrity of Perkins intact," Ms. Driscoll said. "The president’s proposal would have amounted to significant changes in the program, and we’re pleased that those in Congress ... listened to the education community, which said, ‘This is a program that works.’"

However, the House version of the bill, which is awaiting a floor vote after being approved by the House Education and the Workforce Committee on July 21, would merge the Tech Prep and state grants, Ms. Driscoll said.

The Senate version of the bill emphasizes stronger academic and technical skills for students. It would require states to support local programs developing "career pathways" designed to improve graduation rates and lead students from secondary schools to postsecondary education and training. It would also require that businesses be consulted in the drafting of state and local plans.

The bill also calls for increased accountability. It emphasizes the importance of testing students in math and reading, core academic subjects required to be tested by the No Child Left Behind Act, to make sure they’re held to the same standards that other students must meet.

The Senate plan would allow states to withhold funds if local programs did not improve after a period of intervention.

A Change in Wording

It also emphasizes the importance of a strong state role in vocational education. It would keep the 15 percent allocation of funding that states are allowed to keep for administrative and other costs and remove some strictures on how that money must be spent.

The Senate bill would continue the current law’s mandate that 85 percent of federal vocational education money be distributed to local programs. The House version would let states keep no more than 12 percent of the federal funds for state-level costs, funneling more money to the local level.

For the technical education community, one of the most important aspects of the Senate bill is a wording change, Ms. Driscoll said.

Language throughout the bill has been changed from "vocational education" to "career and technical education." Some consider the term "vocational education" outdated. The House version of the bill does not reflect this change in language.

"That kind of language reflects what’s happening in the field, with career and technical education moving forward in many areas and keeping up with current technical and training standards," Ms. Driscoll said. "We’re constantly updating and adding new technology."

Vol. 24, Issue 05, Page 20, 22

Published in Print: September 29, 2004, as Senate Panel Oks Voc. Ed. Reauthorization
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >