Urban Education

Philadelphia Cheers Better Test Scores

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

Excited over a promising batch of test scores, Philadelphia school leaders last week praised the six outside managers that have been running some of the city’s worst-performing schools.

What a difference 2½ years can make.

In January 2002, the school district was newly under state control and hot with controversy over a plan to let education management organizations, or EMOs, run dozens of its 264 schools.

Many district and community leaders approached the partnerships with skepticism or outright opposition. The EMOs, which include for-profit companies, nonprofit groups, and universities, endured an onslaught of criticism.

But all that melted into a praisefest on Aug. 24, when district and EMO representatives gathered to announce city students’ 2004 performance on the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment, the state’s accountability tests.

From 2003 to 2004, the city boosted the total number of schools making adequate yearly progress under the federal No Child Left Behind Act from 58 to 160, nearly a threefold increase. Of the 45 EMO-managed schools, 23 made such progress this year, compared with just seven last year.

While improvements were not stellar in all areas, and the district overall failed to make AYP, the progress sparked a celebratory mood among leaders of the 190,000-student district.

James E. Nevels, the chairman of the state-and-city-appointed panel running the district, said the scores showed "the promise of the partnership management model." Chief Executive Officer Paul G. Vallas praised the hard work of students and staff members.

Mr. Vallas said in a press release issued by Edison Schools Inc., which runs 20 Philadelphia schools, that Edison officials had "clearly demonstrated their ability to take on this challenge and make a critical contribution" to the district.

Some community activists weren’t ready to declare themselves fans of hiring EMOs.

"It could be that the mixed-management model works as long as it’s monitored," said Shelly D. Yanoff, the executive director of the advocacy group Philadelphia Citizens for Children and Youth. "We’ll see."

Vol. 24, Issue 1, Page 6

Published in Print: September 1, 2004, as Philadelphia Cheers Better Test Scores

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >