Federal

Department Questioned On ESEA Guidance

By Bess Keller — January 21, 2004 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Washington

Key congressional Democrats are complaining about the Department of Education’s efforts to implement the No Child Left Behind Act. They accuse the agency of sending “confusing messages” and delaying the release of critical regulations and guidance for states and districts.

See Also...

View the accompanying chart, “Attitudes on No Child Left Behind Law.”

The Democrats also cite instances in which they believe the department has undermined “the letter” of the federal law.

"[T]he potential of the act has yet to be realized in large numbers of communities because of the failure to properly implement and fund the law,” the 10 lawmakers wrote in a letter dated Jan. 8, the second anniversary of the law that is a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.

In the detailed, six-page letter, the Democrats outline a host of concerns with the department’s efforts. The department had not responded to a request for comment as of late last week.

The lawmakers express disappointment with what they call the department’s delay in issuing regulations and guidance.

“Too often, states and school districts have been left without appropriate guidance,” they write. “As a result, misinformation and speculation are rife in local school districts and are contributing to their reluctance to implement the act’s provisions.”

According to the lawmakers, the Education Department has provided “inadequate” technical assistance and information to states on plans for implementation and applications for funding.

They also charge that the department has sent “confusing messages ... about what revisions and changes to [state accountability] plans are deemed acceptable or unacceptable by the department, including revisions in adequate yearly progress, assessments, and the composition and size of subgroups under the law.”

They urge the agency to adopt a formal process for amending state accountability plans. And they call for greater openness from the department.

“We also urge you to provide a more open exchange of information to the public, including the disclosure of details in implementation plans, applications, and policy letters,” they write.

The Democrats point out instances in which they contend the department has undermined the letter of the law, such as the agency’s implementation of requirements related to dropout rates and the guarantee of a “highly qualified” teacher in every classroom.

All nine Democrats on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee signed the letter, as did Rep. George Miller of California, the top Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee.

Department’s Memo

A few of their points appear to echo concerns expressed in a letter the Washington-based Council of Chief State School Officers sent Dec. 30 to the White House.

The chiefs’ letter suggests making more widely available guidance letters the department sends to individual states, and developing a formal process for amending state accountability plans under the No Child Left Behind law.

Last week, the Education Department issued a 10-page memo outlining the flexibility allowed in the No Child Left Behind Act.

“As evidenced by the diversity among the approved state accountability plans and state-consolidated applications, states have great flexibility in the design of their systems and implementation of particular No Child Left Behind provisions,” the memo says. The department identifies a list of “almost 40 separate issues under the control and responsibility of state and local education agencies,” such as standards and assessments.

The Education Department and congressional Republicans, meanwhile, have stepped up their defense against complaints that states have been shortchanged on federal aid to meet No Child Left Behind Act mandates (“Debate Flares Regarding Aid Given to States,” this issue.)

New Poll on Law

In another development in the debate over the ambitious federal law, the National Education Association last week released a survey showing strong support for the law’s accountability measures, but uncertainty about its effects.

The telephone survey of 1,005 registered voters took place on Jan. 4-7 and has a margin of error of 3.1 percentage points.

The survey found that 63 percent of respondents believe that the federal government should spend more on education. There was evidence of growing optimism about the public schools: Seventy-three percent of those surveyed said the schools were at least starting to improve, up 9 percentage points from a similar survey last year. Half the respondents had a positive view of schools this year, compared with just over one-third last year.

Despite support for federal involvement in education, 43 percent said they knew little or nothing about the law. Of those who had formed impressions of its impact, 37 percent viewed the effects as positive, and 21 percent as negative. The proportion of those with positive views increased to more than half after they heard a summary of the law.

On the other hand, of those who said they knew “a lot” about the act, 42 percent were positive before hearing the summary and just 36 percent after hearing it.

Acting Deputy Secretary of Education Eugene W. Hickok seized on the increase from last year in the percentage of those who said schools were “in good shape.”

"[It] shows that something is new and different about education in America today,” he said in a press release. “That something is the No Child Left Behind Act.”

A version of this article appeared in the January 21, 2004 edition of Education Week as Department Questioned On ESEA Guidance

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How To Tackle The Biggest Hurdles To Effective Tutoring
Learn how districts overcome the three biggest challenges to implementing high-impact tutoring with fidelity: time, talent, and funding.
Content provided by Saga Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
Reframing Behavior: Neuroscience-Based Practices for Positive Support
Reframing Behavior helps teachers see the “why” of behavior through a neuroscience lens and provides practices that fit into a school day.
Content provided by Crisis Prevention Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Math for All: Strategies for Inclusive Instruction and Student Success
Looking for ways to make math matter for all your students? Gain strategies that help them make the connection as well as the grade.
Content provided by NMSI

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Electric School Buses Get a Boost From New State and Federal Policies
New federal standards for emissions could accelerate the push to produce buses that run on clean energy.
3 min read
Stockton Unified School District's new electric bus fleet reduces over 120,000 pounds of carbon emissions and leverages The Mobility House's smart charging and energy management system.
A new rule from the Environmental Protection Agency sets higher fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty vehicles. By 2032, it projects, 40 percent of new medium heavy-duty vehicles, including school buses, will be electric.
Business Wire via AP
Federal What Would Happen to K-12 in a 2nd Trump Term? A Detailed Policy Agenda Offers Clues
A conservative policy agenda could offer the clearest view yet of K-12 education in a second Trump term.
8 min read
Republican presidential candidate and former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally, March 9, 2024, in Rome Ga.
Former President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally, March 9, 2024, in Rome, Ga. Allies of the former president have assembled a detailed policy agenda for every corner of the federal government with the idea that it would be ready for a conservative president to use at the start of a new term next year.
Mike Stewart/AP
Federal Opinion Student Literacy Rates Are Concerning. How Can We Turn This Around?
The ranking Republican senator on the education committee wants to hear from educators and families about making improvements.
6 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Federal Biden Calls for Teacher Pay Raises, Expanded Pre-K in State of the Union
President Joe Biden highlighted a number of his education priorities in a high-stakes speech as he seeks a second term.
5 min read
President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol on March 7, 2024, in Washington.
President Joe Biden delivers the State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress at the Capitol on March 7, 2024, in Washington.
Shawn Thew/Pool via AP