13 Nominated to New Panel Overseeing Federal Education Research

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

President Bush has nominated 13 members to an advisory board on educational research more than a year after the panel was established.

They range from respected researchers at Stanford and Yale universities to the chairman of Florida’s state board of education. The nominees still must be approved by the Senate.

The federal board will advise the director of the newly established Institute of Education Sciences, the Department of Education’s primary research arm. The board will also, among other duties, approve the director’s proposed priorities for funding research and review and evaluate the institute’s work.

Both the institute and advisory board were founded under the bipartisan Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002. That law effectively abolished the department’s office of educational research and improvement.

Grover J. "Russ" Whitehurst, the director of the education institute, said he expects the board’s first priority will be to consider his plans for underwriting research. "I’d like for them to do that relatively soon," he said.

Beyond the advisory and oversight roles, Mr. Whitehurst said, the board is free to issue reports, contract work, or address communications to Congress and the president.

"I expect that they will be very active in both advocating for a greater role for educational research in the education enterprise, ... and speaking to the nature of that research—what it should look like," he said.

'Right Side?'

"The first appointments include many people who are exceptionally well- qualified," said Gerald R. Sroufe, the director of government relations for the Washington-based American Educational Research Association. From a political standpoint, however, “most of the apples seemed to have been picked from the right side of the tree,” he said.

But Christopher T. Cross, an assistant education secretary for research under President George H.W. Bush, disagreed.

"You couldn’t put all of them in the same [political] barrel," he countered.

That said, Mr. Cross sees at least one consistency among the nominees. "They all tend to be people who have experience in this area of moving toward much more scientifically based research," he said.

The nominees are: Jonathan Baron, the executive director of the Washington- based Coalition for Evidence-Based Research; Elizabeth Ann Bryan, a former adviser to Secretary of Education Rod Paige; James R. Davis, the superintendent of the Hattiesburg, Miss., public schools; Robert C. Granger, the president of the New York City-based William T. Grant Foundation; Frank Philip Handy, the chairman of Florida’s state board of education; Eric A. Hanushek, a professor at Stanford University; Caroline M. Hoxby, a professor at Harvard University.

Also nominated were Gerald Lee, the president of WBEB radio in Philadelphia and a member of the Coalition for Evidence-Based Research advisory board; Roberto Ibarra Lopez, the superintendent of a Houston charter school; Richard James Milgram, a professor at Stanford University; Sally E. Shaywitz, a professor at Yale University; Joseph K. Torgesen, a professor at Florida State University; and Herbert J. Walberg, a professor emeritus at the University of Chicago.

The White House still must name two more members to the board.

Vol. 23, Issue 15, Page 23

Published in Print: December 10, 2003, as 13 Nominated to New Panel Overseeing Federal Education Research
Web Resources
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >