Hasty Hiring, Heavy Duties Found to Plague New Teachers

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

New research on beginning teachers suggests that more than a third are hired after the school year starts, and that most are jumping into jobs where they are expected to shoulder the same responsibilities as their more experienced colleagues.

For More Info
The study is available from the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.

The findings, presented here last week during the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, are the latest from the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers, conducted by Harvard University's graduate school of education. Led by professor Susan Moore Johnson, the project is a multipronged research effort begun four years ago to examine how new teachers are recruited, hired, and supported.

Coming at a time when many K-12 schools are facing teacher shortages, the project is poised to provide important clues on ways schools can keep their classes fully staffed. National estimates suggest that as many as 20 percent of teachers quit by the end of their third year of teaching.

Edward Liu and Susan M. Kardos, both research assistants with the project, presented the new data last week. They based their findings on surveys of 486 first- and second-year teachers in 186 elementary, middle, and high schools in four heavily populated states: California, Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan.

Contrary to the traditional image of new teachers as 22- or 23-year-olds fresh out of college, 46 percent of the teachers in the study sample had switched to teaching from other careers. The average age of the midcareer entrants was 38.

In keeping with a nationwide trend toward moving management decisions from districts to schools, Mr. Liu said, most of the newcomers had undergone decentralized hiring processes. Only 23 percent of the new teachers surveyed, for example, were offered their positions by districts' central offices.

The rest were hired by individual schools, either directly or after an initial screening by the central office.

Missed Opportunities

Even so, the findings suggest that the teachers were hired hastily, and that the process typically relied heavily on reviews of the new hires' paper credentials, rather than on extended interactions with the school community or on any demonstrations of teachers' abilities.

For example, the study showed that:

  • Thirty-three percent of the new teachers were hired after the start of the school year; 62 percent were hired within 30 days of the date they started the job.
  • While principals interviewed 88 percent of the newcomers, only half the teachers got an opportunity to interview with teachers at the school. One exception was in Michigan, where the hiring process exposes potential teachers to a broad range of school people.
  • Only 7.5 percent of the teachers were observed teaching a sample lesson as part of the hiring process; 35 percent got a chance to observe classes.

One reason the hiring procedures may not have been more extensive, Mr. Liu said, is that administrators are often hampered by practical constraints—late-arriving budgets, for example, or union rules.

"The trend toward decentralization doesn't necessarily change hiring practices," Mr. Liu added. "It changes the responsibility for hiring and pushes it down."

Once hired, said Ms. Kardos, teachers enter one of three types of professional environments: a veteran-dominated culture, in which the most experienced teachers set the tone for the school's teaching practices; a novice-oriented culture typical of charter schools, newly reconstituted schools, and others with high concentrations of new teachers; and a more integrated environment, where neophytes and their more experienced colleagues are continually communicating.

Newcomers get a chance to benefit from veteran teachers' wisdom only in the third type of culture, according to Ms. Kardos, who hypothesizes that such settings might also better enable novice teachers to succeed.

Yet the study findings suggest that, for many new teachers, the first couple of years on the job are considerably less supportive and collaborative.

For example, 43 percent of new teachers said no mentors or more experienced colleagues observed them in the classroom the entire first year. More than half—56 percent—said they got no special help because they were new. Seventy-seven percent said that they shouldered the same academic and administrative responsibilities as those of veteran teachers.

Still, Wade Devlin-Scherer, an education researcher at the State University of New York at Plattsburgh who critiqued the study, said he saw some signs of progress. For instance, he noted, 41 percent of the teachers said they had submitted portfolios during the hiring process.

What's clear from the study so far, said Ms. Kardos, is that researchers need to focus on new teachers' experiences at the classroom and school levels, rather than on teacher-retention and recruitment policies.

"Not one single new teacher was surprised by the size of their paychecks," she said. "But they were surprised at how hard it was to do the thing they wanted to do most—and that was to teach children."

Vol. 22, Issue 33, Page 7

Published in Print: April 30, 2003, as Hasty Hiring, Heavy Duties Found to Plague New Teachers
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >