Departments

State Journal

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

Report Distribution

A disagreement over how a $500,000, state-financed education audit was—or was not—distributed is creating a brouhaha in Indiana.

For More Info
To receive an electronic copy of the report, "Efficiency & Excellence," from the Indiana Department of Education, send an e-mail to [email protected].

In its Sept. 15 edition, the Indianapolis Star quotes a former education adviser to Democratic Gov. Frank L. O'Bannon as saying the state department of education tried to bury the 2001 audit's findings and recommendations.

Larry Grau, who made the accusation, repeated the assertion in an interview last week. "There was no apparent effort to get the report out there," he said. But he acknowledged that anyone could request copies from the education department.

Still, he criticizes Suellen K. Reed, the state's Republican elected superintendent of schools, for failing to promote the findings of the report.

The report recommended, among other ideas, that Indiana establish education goals and move from an elected state schools chief to an appointed one.

Normally, Mr. Grau said, such reports get posted electronically and an ample number of copies are sent to the governor's office for distribution. He said neither happened with the study, titled "Efficiency & Excellence," prepared by the National Association of State Boards of Education, the National Governors Association, and an Indiana public accounting and consulting firm, Crowe Chizek and Company, LLP.

Terry Spradlin, the legislative liaison for the department of education, disagrees. "The concept that this was a hidden report and buried is inaccurate," he said. The Indianapolis Star and Education Week published articles about it in 2001, he noted.

Education Week's Feb. 14, 2001, article ("Indiana Urged to Switch to Appointed State Schools Chief,"), was based on a draft of the report's executive summary.

The department distributed the report to the state board of education and the Education Roundtable, an advisory group to the board that includes four legislators, Mr. Spradlin said.

Mr. Spradlin said the report contained inaccuracies and "didn't recognize many things that we were in the process of doing."

He says the department met its obligation to make the report available.

—Mary Ann Zehr

Vol. 22, Issue 4, Page 17

Published in Print: September 25, 2002, as State Journal

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >