Lawsuit Challenges Department's Gender-Equity Rules

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A group of wrestling coaches and university groups claims in a lawsuit filed last week that the Department of Education has instilled discrimination against men's sports teams into its interpretation of the federal Title IX law.

In the suit filed against the agency in federal court here on Jan. 16, the National Wrestling Coaches Association and organizations representing students and alumni at three universities argue that a 1996 rule by the Education Department was adopted illegally and is unconstitutional. That rule, in part, says that schools must count actual athletes, not spots available on teams, to prove gender equity.

To comply with that rule, some schools have been forced to cut men's sports teams to ensure proportionate numbers of male and female athletes, the plaintiffs say.

Forcing "a male athlete off a team or cutting an entire men's team solely because not enough female athletes have an interest in athletics is gender discrimination per se—with absolutely no corresponding benefit to women," the lawsuit charges.

The suit does not challenge Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, passed by Congress to ensure that schools and colleges receiving federal funds were giving equal educational and athletic opportunities to both men and women. Many individual lawsuits have been unsuccessfully brought against the universities that cut men's teams, but the one filed last week targets the Education Department and its 1996 regulation.

"We hope this lawsuit will lead to a more reasonable way to enforce Title IX, one that protects women without harming men," said Mike Moyer, the executive director of the wrestling coaches' association, based in Lancaster, Pa.

Discrimination or Not?

The plaintiffs include students and alumni from Bucknell University in Lewisburg, Pa. The school decided last year to eliminate its men's wrestling team and downgraded men's crew to intramural status, to comply with Title IX rules, said spokesman Jon Terry. Groups representing wrestling teams eliminated or downgraded at Marquette University in Milwaukee and Yale University are also plaintiffs.

The Education Department does not comment on pending litigation, said Rodger Murphey, a spokesman. But some women's groups contend that the lawsuit is unfounded, and could undermine what they regard as a much-needed anti-discrimination law.

Officials of the National Women's Sports Foundation, based in East Meadow, N.Y., maintained that some men's teams had suffered because schools had simply chosen to spend more money on teams seen as popular moneymakers rather than keeping teams that did not bring in profits or large crowds.

A university's decision to cut a team is "a competitive-status decision that may result in less men's or women's teams, not a decision that discriminates on the basis of gender," Donna Lopiano, the foundation's executive director, said in a statement.

Vol. 21, Issue 19, Page 5

Published in Print: January 23, 2002, as Lawsuit Challenges Department's Gender-Equity Rules
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >