Children and Welfare Reform

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Researchers examined the following welfare-reform programs to understand what effect they had on children:

  • The National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies (NEWWS) included six programs in three sites—Atlanta, Grand Rapids, Mich., and Riverside, Calif. Welfare recipients were required to participate in an education program or to look for a job. Those who didn't meet the requirements were subject to penalties.
  • The Minnesota Family Investment Program (MFIP) operated throughout Minnesota. "Full" MFIP, as it was known, included an earnings supplement, a mandatory employment requirement, and child-care subsidies. MFIP Incentives Only, another version of the program, included all of the same features except the employment requirement.
  • The Self- Sufficiency Project (SSP) operated in two Canadian provinces, New Brunswick and British Columbia. The program offered an earnings supplement to welfare recipients who worked at least 30 hours a week.
  • The New Hope program targeted both welfare recipients and low-income families in Milwaukee, Wis. Like the SSP, it offered an earnings supplement to those who worked at least 30 hours a week. In-kind benefits were available, and participants were also eligible to receive child-care and health-insurance subsidies. Intensive case management was also provided for the families.
  • The Family Transition Program (FTP) operated in Escambia County, Fla., which includes the city of Pensacola. The program combined an earnings supplement and a mandatory work activity with a time limit on the receipt of welfare benefits. The time limit was 24 or 36 months, depending on family income, within a 60- month period. Exemptions were granted to parents who became disabled. Parents were also required to make sure that their children were immunized and attending school regularly.

SOURCE: Manpower Demonstration Research Corp.

Vol. 20, Issue 20, Page 5

Published in Print: January 31, 2001, as Children and Welfare Reform
Related Stories
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >