President Seeks Bigger Budget For Research

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Federal spending on education research would see a sizable increase under the fiscal 2001 budget proposal President Clinton delivered to Congress last month, though the level would remain far below that recommended by a White House panel three years ago.

The Department of Education’s main research arm, the office of educational research and improvement, would receive an additional $30 million for research, for a total of nearly $200 million, under the plan.

This comes as part of an overall budget proposal that contains the largest single increase in discretionary spending in the department’s history. The president requested $40.1 billion, an increase of $4.5 billion or 12.7 percent over the department’s discretionary budget for fiscal 2000.

Gerald R. Sroufe, the government relations director for the American Educational Research Association, an independent organization representing more than 22,000 members, described the administration’s proposal for research in OERI as "reasonable." He observed that the OERI law is currently up for reauthorization, adding that Congress would be unlikely to add more than $30 million before taking a broad look at the office’s mission.

He also said that big spending on education research is not usually very popular on Capitol Hill. As lawmakers view it, he said, "the trade-off is between money for research and money for programs."

The president requested a $55 million increase for the OERI research budget in fiscal 2000. But Congress balked at that figure, ultimately raising the budget by $25 million, to $168.6 million. The year before, Mr. Clinton requested a $50 million increase; Congress raised it instead by $15 million.

Mr. Sroufe and others pointed out that the administration’s current request is far below the $1.5 billion annual research budget recommended by a panel of the President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology in March 1997. That panel called for phasing in a dramatically increased level of spending "aimed specifically at improving the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of K-12 education in the United States."

C. Kent McGuire, the assistant secretary for OERI, said department officials would like to have asked for a larger increase this year, "but there are any number of priorities in the department."

Other Agencies

The OERI is not the only place to look for federal spending on education-related research, Mr. McGuire noted.

Under the president’s fiscal 2001 budget, the Education Department’s office of special education and rehabilitative services, for example, would spend $30.2 million for research to improve educational services for children with disabilities. That would be $2.6 million less than this year.

Also, the president’s budget request for OSERS contains $100 million for the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, up from $86.5 million this year.

As for other agencies, the administration’s proposed budget for the National Science Foundation contains $55.2 million in education-related research, an increase of $6.1 million over the current fiscal year. Much of the research addresses science and mathematics instruction.

And the National Institute for Child Health and Human Development is planning to spend $32.5 million in fiscal 2001 to support research on reading, up from $24 million this year. The institute, not Congress, sets the research spending levels within its overall budget.

The OERI research budget covers everything from regional educational laboratories to university-based centers and various dissemination activities. Topics vary widely, ranging from efforts to improve reading, math, and science education to studies of existing school- improvement models.

Mr. McGuire said this year’s budget is linked to changes the department is proposing for the OERI’s reauthorization to improve the office’s processes for conducting research.

But C. Todd Jones, the president of the National Education Knowledge Industry Association, a trade group for the education research and development industry, said he is concerned that one key change in the budget proposal could leave funding for certain priorities vulnerable. The president’s plan would replace the three current line items of funding that now make up the research budget—national education research institutes, regional educational laboratories, and national dissemination activities—with one line item for "research, development, and dissemination."

"By having a consolidated line item, it doesn’t give Congress the ability to set out" specific amounts for each category, Mr. Jones said.

Mr. McGuire said the change was designed to "simplify and streamline" the presentation of the budget, and that "no one should read into that that we are somehow consolidating resources." He added that supporting budget documents outline specific funding levels the department would provide for various activities.

As always, the fate of these proposed changes, as well as the funding levels, lies with Congress. Dan Lara, a spokesman for Republicans on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, cautioned that lawmakers will have a lot of questions "about funding that kind of increase without putting some more quality control [measures in place] to make sure that research meets high standards."

Vol. 19, Issue 26, Page 30

Published in Print: March 8, 2000, as President Seeks Bigger Budget For Research
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >