Departments

Federal File

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

Delay criticized

Members of the congressional New Democratic Coalition expressed dismay last week at the Department of Education's recent decision to give teachers' colleges an extra year before they have to start reporting on the quality of their programs.

The 1998 reauthorization of the Higher Education Act contains new accountability measures requiring, among other provisions, that university teacher-training programs begin reporting their graduates' performance on state licensing and certification exams to states by April of this year. The states must then submit reports on the programs to the federal Education Department.

But the department decided in January that colleges could wait until April 2001 to file their first reports, with the state reports due the following October. ("Teacher Colleges, States Granted Report Card Extensions," Feb. 2, 2000.)

"Congress intended this process to present a clearer and broader picture of the readiness of our nation's teacher workforce," the Democratic lawmakers wrote in a Feb. 10 letter to Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley. "The decision to postpone the initial reports by a full year greatly troubles us."

The coalition is a group of moderate Democrats formed in 1997. Thirty-two of the coalition's 65 members signed the letter, which was circulated by Rep. Ron Kind of Wisconsin.


Terry Knecht Dozier, a senior adviser to Secretary Riley on teaching, said certain requirements of the law, especially those designed to ensure the data are comparable and verifiable, have contributed to the delay. The lawmakers also asked the department to respond to allegations that a consultative committee formed to help with the process was biased against the reporting.

Ms. Dozier said that "if you look at the membership of the committee, they are very broad-based" and include members of Congress. She added that the body did not have decision-making power.

—Erik W. Robelen

Vol. 19, Issue 24, Page 25

Published in Print: February 23, 2000, as Federal File

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >