Ed. Dept. Tries To Shield Key Programs From Cuts

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Funding for programs to assist disadvantaged K-12 students and encourage class-size reduction escaped the Department of Education scalpel as the agency last week unveiled details of how it would comply with a $108 million mandated cut in its fiscal 2000 budget.

The $7.7 billion Pell Grants program for higher education, which according to the department has enjoyed an annual surplus since 1998, bore the brunt of the impact with a $60 million cut.

"We were able to take a fraction of that surplus without any impact" on the number of students receiving grants or the size of grants, said Erica Lepping, the spokeswoman for Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley. The program generates a surplus because fewer than expected students have applied for the grants, she added.

As part of the final negotiations last fall on the budget for the fiscal year that began Oct. 1, the White House and Congress agreed to reduce spending across all agencies by 0.38 percent. Each department and agency has discretion in deciding what to cut, though no single program's budget could be reduced by more than 15 percent.

The $108 million reduction comes out of a $36 billion Education Department budget. Among the many initiatives spared cuts were the $8 billion Title I program for disadvantaged students and $1.3 billion in second-year funding for President Clinton's prized class-size-reduction initiatives.

The areas seeing cuts include the $380 million Title VI block grant program, which will lose $14.25 million of its fiscal 2000 appropriation, and the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities program, which will lose $5.75 million of its anticipated $445 million in state grants. In both cases, the cuts will cause funding to fall just shy of fiscal 1999 levels.

Other cuts include $4 million from the $910 million impact-aid program, which helps compensate districts for the financial effects of federal installations and activities.

—Erik W. Robelen

Vol. 19, Issue 19, Page 26

Published in Print: January 19, 2000, as Ed. Dept. Tries To Shield Key Programs From Cuts
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >