Student Achievement

Plans in Houston and N.Y.C. Would Tighten Promotion Rules

By Caroline Hendrie — April 29, 1998 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

New York City last week became the latest big-city district to declare war on promoting students who aren’t ready for the next grade, as Houston moved just one step away from making a ban on the practice a reality.

The Houston school board gave preliminary approval earlier this month to the proposed promotion standards, which Superintendent Rod Paige called “a major step toward academic accountability.” The policy, expected to win final approval next month, would deny students advancement to the next grade if their grades and test scores were not up to snuff.

In New York, Schools Chancellor Rudy F. Crew unveiled a plan last week to prevent the academically unjustified promotion of students for social reasons.

The developments come as a growing number of districts and states crack down on the “social promotion” of students. Many politicians, including President Clinton, have recently denounced the practice, as has the American Federation of Teachers. (“Promote or Retain? Pendulum for Students Swings Back Again,” June 11, 1997.)

Chicago’s 3-year-old policy, which involves mandatory summer school and has been repeatedly expanded to include more grades, has drawn nationwide publicity. Others gearing up to attack the issue include Boston, Philadelphia, and Seattle.

Among states, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, and Louisiana have cracked down in recent years. In Texas, Gov. George W. Bush is pushing a plan to ban social promotions statewide. The governor was on hand when Mr. Paige rolled out his proposal in January, and said he hoped more Texas districts would follow Houston’s lead.

Summer School Required

Under the Houston plan, students would be expected to pass state achievement tests, score no more than one grade level behind on nationally norm-referenced exams, and post an average grade of 70 in their class work to advance.

Students falling short in any area would be required to attend summer school. And if they failed to meet two or more of the promotion criteria, they would be held back. The new rules would take effect in grades 1-3 starting next spring and in grades 3-8 in 2000.

Under current district policy, students may be retained no more than once in elementary school and once in middle school. The state required such limits on retention until last year.

District leaders say that they will devise programs for helping students at risk of failing to meet the new promotion standards, but that the details have yet to be nailed down.

Talks With Union on Tap

In New York, Mr. Crew unveiled a draft plan last week to require 4th and 7th graders to meet minimum standards to advance. Criteria would include passing scores on state and city achievement tests, classroom grades and course work, and attendance.

To prepare students for the 4th grade milepost, Mr. Crew wants to expand the 1.1 million-student district’s summer literacy program for students in grades K-2, as well as separate summer programs serving struggling 3rd graders and middle schoolers.

Mr. Crew discussed his proposal with the school board in closed session because it involved matters to be negotiated with employee unions, said Chiara Coletti, a district spokeswoman. Among the central issues will be summer school and how teachers will be compensated for it, she said.

Deputy Chancellor Judith Rizzo said last week that school officials had not yet determined under what circumstances, if any, children would be required to attend summer school. She said mandatory summer classes might not be needed, especially if the district wins its battle to extend the school year by 20 days.

The district has identified 220,000 students in grades K-8 who are performing below grade level, but had money last year to send fewer than 54,000 of them to summer school. Providing summer school for the rest of the identified children would cost an extra $76 million, the districtestimates.

Mr. Crew wants to delay implementation of the new standards until the 1999-2000 school year.

Related Tags:

Events

Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
Ed-Tech Policy Webinar Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Building a Roadmap for AI Use in Schools
AI in education: game-changer or classroom chaos? Join our webinar & learn how to navigate this evolving tech responsibly.
Education Webinar Developing and Executing Impactful Research Campaigns to Fuel Your Ed Marketing Strategy 
Develop impactful research campaigns to fuel your marketing. Join the EdWeek Research Center for a webinar with actionable take-aways for companies who sell to K-12 districts.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Student Achievement Quiz Quiz Yourself: How Much Do You Know About Improving Student Outcomes?
Answer 7 questions about improving student learning outcomes.
Student Achievement Spotlight Spotlight on Student Engagement & Hands-On Learning
This Spotlight will help you learn about reducing student ambivalence towards math, proven strategies for reengaging students, and more.


Student Achievement What the Research Says Next NAEP to Take Deeper Look at Poverty's Connection to Students' Achievement
Researchers say the new measure could yield a more accurate reading of how family income affects students' test scores.
5 min read
Glitch stylized photo of a white woman with a hood over her head.
iStock/Getty
Student Achievement Opinion Traditional Grading May Not Be as Straightforward as It Seems
It can demotivate students, reflect inaccurate learning, and be biased against slower learners, argues an equitable grading advocate.
9 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty