Concentrated Poverty

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The biggest challenge facing U.S. cities and their school systems is concentrated poverty. In poor neighborhoods, the deck is stacked against children from the moment they are born. The odds are higher that they will have lower-than-normal birth weights, lack access to regular medical care, live in a household headed by a single mother, become a victim of crime, have a parent who never finished high school, become pregnant before reaching adulthood, and drop out of school.

"Everyone talks about white flight, but the real issue is that people with money have left," says Arthur Carter, the deputy superintendent of the Detroit public schools. "It's not just a question of white flight, but of money with wings."

Urban schools are different because they are more likely than nonurban ones to have a high percentage of low-income students. Concentrated school poverty is consistently related to lower performance on every educational outcome measured.

The most recent evidence comes from the "Prospects" report, a congressionally mandated, four-year study of about 27,000 students served under Title I, the federal program designed to raise the achievement of disadvantaged youngsters. The report concluded that "school poverty depresses the scores of all students in schools where at least half of the students are eligible for subsidized lunch, and seriously depresses the scores when more than 75 percent of students live in low-income households."

On the other hand, poor students who attend middle-class schools performed significantly better.

The small but important number of successful schools in poor neighborhoods proves that children in concentrated poverty can excel. But that requires a greater commitment from educators and the public--an effort that, so far, has not been forthcoming.

"The point is that while poverty is not an excuse, thousands of urban children and urban teachers and principals and parents have a tougher time because of it," say Philadelphia Superintendent David W. Hornbeck. "Any restructuring effort that does not aggressively respond to the impact of poverty is naive."

Concentrated poverty is an overwhelmingly urban phenomenon, and one that afflicts far more black children than any other racial or ethnic group. The U.S. Census Bureau defines "extreme poverty areas" as census tracts or neighborhoods where at least 40 percent of the residents are poor.

Between 1970 and 1990, concentrated poverty spread like a cancer through America's cities, writes Myron Orfield, a lawyer and Minnesota state legislator, in his book Metropolitics. The number of people living in neighborhoods of dense poverty swelled from 4.1 million to 8 million, nearly one-third of them children, he found.

Half the children who live in extremely impoverished neighborhoods are in the 75 cities examined by Quality Counts. In eight states--Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Nebraska, New York, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin--more than 70 percent of the children in concentrated poverty are found in a single city. It is perhaps not a coincidence that this list includes states that have some of the largest achievement gap between urban and nonurban districts.

Many people suggest that schools are the victims of poor neighborhoods. But, Mr. Orfield argues, bad schools also help create--and perpetuate--bad neighborhoods.

"Local schools become socioeconomically distressed before neighborhoods become poor," he writes. "When middle-class families and pundits say that cities have bad schools, what they often mean is that cities have schools full of poor children. Middle-class families, the bedrock of stable communities, will not tolerate high concentrations of poverty in their schools.”

Vol. 17, Issue 17, Page 14

Published in Print: January 8, 1998, as Concentrated Poverty
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >