Federal File

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints

Top ranking

In the rough-and-tumble world of Washington politics, the National Education Association has the muscle to grapple with the strongest competitors, says a poll of capital insiders.

The NEA combines the brawn of 2.3 million members, many of whom are outspoken and politically active, with a war chest of campaign contributions. That combination moved it to the No. 9 ranking of effective lobbying organizations in Fortune magazine's first-ever survey of 329 members of Congress, White House aides, lobbyists, and academics.

"They're a force day in and day out," said Mark Mellman, the Democratic half of the bipartisan polling team that conducted the survey for the magazine's Dec. 8 edition.

The union also has the dollars to back up its grassroots work. Its political-action committee distributed $2.3 million to federal candidates, 99 percent of which went to Democrats, in the 1995-96 election cycle.

But money alone doesn't ensure a ranking in the power elite, Mr. Mellman said. Others in the top five are: the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the AFL-cio, the National Federation of Independent Business, and the Association of Trial Lawyers of America.

"There are a number of bases of power," Mr. Mellman said. "First in order of importance is the ability to generate grassroots activities."

The American Federation of Teachers ranked 38th in the survey.

The AFT's membership is less than half that of the NEA and doesn't cover as many states or congressional districts. Still, the smaller union scored higher than the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the Children's Defense Fund, and the American Bar Association.

Piscataway finale

The final curtain fell last week on the long-running drama known as Piscataway Township v. Taxman.

The Piscataway, N.J., school board last month agreed to a surprise settlement of the bias case filed by Sharon Taxman, the white teacher laid off in 1989 to preserve the job of a black colleague.

On Dec. 2, the two sides filed their formal request to withdraw the case from the U.S. Supreme Court's docket. The court clerk's office processed the paperwork within hours and the case was dismissed. Under the court's procedural rules, the justices do not even need to be bothered when both sides in a case agree to settle.


Web Only

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >