News In Brief: A Washington Roundup

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Conferees Target Title I Losses

Congressional appropriators plan to give 32 states about half of the money they need to compensate for losses caused by a Department of Education decision to calculate Title I aid using new child-poverty data.

A House-Senate conference committee decided last week to add $101 million to the $7.1 billion program this year to make up for losses in states that will lose a share of their Title I funding because the department will rely on partially updated poverty data when distributing money.

In an amendment to a disaster-relief bill, the Senate voted to appropriate $198 million so every state would receive the same amount it would have netted without the Title I change. (See "60% of Counties To Receive Less In Title I Grants," May 7, 1997.) The House's companion bill did not include Title I money. But a committee working out bill compromises agreed to meet roughly in the middle, a spokeswoman for the House Appropriations Committee said last week. Conferees also agreed to fund a four-month, $650,000 study of rising college costs.

President Clinton has threatened to veto the funding measure if it includes a GOP provision to "level fund" programs if he and Congress can not agree on a final budget plan before Oct. 1.

Work Begins on Juvenile-Justice Bill

Giving states and local communities greater flexibility to prevent juvenile crime will figure prominently in the reauthorization of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Protection Act, a House subcommittee leader said last week.

Rep. Frank Riggs, R-Calif., the chairman of the subcommittee, said a proposed reauthorization plan would consolidate five programs into a block grant for states to use for crime prevention and current grant programs.

The subcommittee views the reauthorization plan as a starting point, Mr. Riggs said. As it stands now, the proposal would authorize funding for local communities seeking to operate delinquency-prevention programs consistent with local crime-prevention plans. Higher-crime areas with multidisciplinary plans would receive priority for funding.

Web Only

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories