5% of Scholarships Found To Be Race-Based Aid

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments


Of undergraduate college scholarships targeted toward members of minority groups in the 1991-92 academic year, 5 percent were available only to minority students, a long-awaited federal study has found.

Racial or ethnic minorities received 75 percent of the scholarships and 82 percent of the scholarship dollars targeted partially or exclusively toward members of minority groups, the General Accounting Office study said.

Two-thirds of four-year undergraduate institutions conferred at least one "minority-targeted scholarship,'' and such awards make up 5 percent of all scholarships and 4 percent of all scholarship dollars distributed across the country, the G.A.O. found.

The study, "Higher Education: Information on Minority-Targeted Scholarships,'' studied scholarships targeted toward students of a particular gender, age, or religion, or toward disabled students, as well as those aimed at racial and ethnic minority groups. The study was based on a survey sent to 649 public and private institutions, as well as six on-site audits.

Three Categories

The G.A.O. broke down minority-targeted scholarships into three categories: race-exclusive awards, available only to members of one or more racial minority groups; minority-designated awards, in which race is one of several required eligibility factors; and minority-considered, in which a particular racial background is considered a positive factor but is not a requirement.

Race-exclusive scholarships made up less than 1 percent of all scholarships in undergraduate and graduate programs, and about 3 percent awarded by professional schools, the study found.

About 7 percent of all members of racial minorities attending igher-education institutions received a targeted scholarship, and less than 4 percent received a targeted scholarship that was available exclusively to members of a particular race.

In undergraduate schools, private endowments provide nearly 60 percent of all minority-targeted scholarship dollars, the report said, while tuition and fees provide the most money for such scholarships in graduate schools.

Release of the 99-page study, which was commissioned by eight members of Congress in 1992, reopens a contentious political issue by clearing the way for the Education Department to issue policy guidelines on the legality of minority-targeted scholarships.

The controversy began in December 1990, when Michael L. Williams, then the agency's assistant secretary for civil rights, essentially declared race-exclusive scholarships illegal under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin.

A firestorm of controversy erupted over the legal validity of Mr. Williams's decision, whether it represented a reversal of federal policy, and its potential implications for minority access to higher education.

Lamar Alexander, then the Secretary of Education, released proposed guidelines in December 1991 that said race or national origin could be used as one of several factors in determining scholarship eligibility, but essentially backed Mr. Williams's interpretation.

However, Mr. Alexander agreed to a request from members of Congress to hold off on formally publishing regulations until the G.A.O. had weighed in.

Last March, Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley announced his support for race-based scholarships but said he, too, would wait for the G.A.O. report.

Secretary Riley said in a statement this month that department officials are reviewing the report and that "we will shortly issue final policy guidelines.''

Disparate Viewpoints

Civil-rights advocates, higher-education leaders, federal officials, and conservative advocates who have been mired in debate over the legality of such scholarships for the past three years generally agree that the issue will ultimately be resolved in the courts.

David Merkowitz, a spokesman for the American Council on Education, said that the organization feels "vindicated'' because the G.A.O. findings mirror those of an A.C.E. survey conducted soon after the controversy erupted.

"There's nothing surprising in these findings,'' he said.

Mr. Merkowitz noted that information from the audits contained in the report revealed that higher-education leaders found minority-targeted scholarships helpful in recruiting and retaining minority students, signaling the importance of minority students to their institutions, and creating a comfortable campus climate for minorities.

But Richard Samp, the general counsel for the Washington Legal Foundation, which is challenging the legality of race-exclusive scholarships in the courts, said he found the percentage of such scholarships high.

"I'm shocked at how many there are,'' he said.

Mr. Samp added that he thought the distinctions made by the G.A.O. in regard to how race factored into scholarship eligibility are "relatively artificial.''

Vol. 13, Issue 18

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >