Testing Column

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Research in the field of testing has long suggested that students can correctly answer some questions on reading-comprehension tests without having read the passages on which they are based.

Recently, researchers at the College Board, the nonprofit association that administers the S.A.T., studied that phenomenon in relationship to the revised test, which will be administered for the first time in March under its new name, the Scholastic Assessment Test. The researchers, Donald E. Powers and Susan T. Wilson, gave questions from the test without any reading passages to 350 high school juniors. Then they compared their scores with those of 10,000 other students who took the new test as part of a trial in 1990 and 1991.

They concluded that the students in the smaller group did better than they would have answering the questions by chance, but not as well as the test-takers who had read the passages. On some test items, the groups differed by as much as 21 percentage points in the proportion of correct answers given.

Interviewed after the test, half of the participants said the nonreading strategy might help if test time was short. Most, however, recommended reading the passages.

The study is available for $12 plus $3.95 for handling from College Board Publications, Box 86, New York, N.Y. 10101-0886. The item number is 217849.

Although 70 percent of the statewide tests given to schoolchildren are multiple choice, alternative approaches to assessing students are making some inroads into state testing programs.

According to a survey by the Educational Testing Service, 12 percent of statewide tests require students to provide writing samples. Eighteen states are developing short-answer questions for their assessments, and 22 states are working with longer, open-ended questions.

In addition, individual-performance assessments are being used in 14 states, and nine states are using portfolios of student work or learning records to evaluate students.

Despite all that activity, "states do not appear to be acting hastily, however, and show no signs of abandoning their traditional assessment methods,'' say the authors, Paul Barton and Richard Coley.

Copies of the 40-page survey, "Testing in America's Schools,'' are available for $7.50 prepaid by writing the E.T.S. Policy Information Center (O4-R), Rosedale Road, Princeton, N.J. 08541-0001.


Vol. 13, Issue 17

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >