Teacher Contract Disputes in Several Urban Districts Heat Up

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

More than a month into the new school year, several urban school districts are still locked in contract disputes over teachers' pay and benefits.

While there appeared to be no immediate threat of a walkout in those school systems, a dozen affiliates of the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers were on strike last week in small districts in Illinois, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, according to the N.E.A. (See Education Week, Sept. 22, 1993.)

The largest teachers' strike, in the 24,000-student Youngstown, Ohio, schools, was settled when the union accepted the district's contract offer last week.

But most of the battles in the cash-strapped urban districts were heating up, as the unions filed legal challenges or organized protests disputing the fairness of the cost-of-living raises or salary cuts included in contracts.

In Boston, negotiations stalled between the school committee and the teachers' union late last month, after the committee rejected as too expensive a tentative agreement that would have raised teachers' salaries by 11 percent over three years.

The union challenged the decision in court last week, arguing that Acting Mayor Thomas Menino--who will face State Rep. James T. Brett in the Nov. 2 mayoral election--did not have the authority to appoint a new school committee member who was among those opposing the pact.

With the court decision pending, the union was expected to take a strike vote this week.

Denver Teachers File Suit


In Denver, meanwhile, the teachers' union charged that the district has violated a contract negotiated in 1990 by Gov. Roy Romer of Colorado, who invoked an obscure state law allowing him to intervene in labor disputes.

The contract stipulated that teachers would receive a 3.5 percent raise for each year of the three-year pact, but the district did not include the raise in its 1993-94 budget, said Leonard Fox, the president of the Denver Teachers' Association.

School officials justified the move by pointing to a Colorado statute that allows salary negotiations to be reopened under multiyear contracts. The union countered that pacts can only be renegotiated by mutual consent.

Last week, the union filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit--which is expected to be considered at a preliminary hearing this week--and the city's teachers continued to organize public protests, Mr. Fox said.

In the District of Columbia public schools, teachers were also contesting what they say is the school district's attempt to abandon part of a salary package brokered last fall.

Work-to-Rule Tactics


Jimmie Jackson, the president of the 5,500-member Washington Teachers' Union, said the union negotiated a contract with the schools that, among other provisions, gives teachers a 6.5 percent pay increase, retroactive to last October.

While school officials have agreed to furnish that retroactive pay hike, the city council--which has authority over school funds--said last week that it cannot set aside the money necessary to pay for another agreed-upon pay increase retroactive to 1992.

To protest what the they call a breach of contract, union leaders have asked members to adopt a work-to-the-rule policy and refuse to perform any duties outside the regular school day until the district agrees to enforce the contract.

Meanwhile, in Cleveland, where teachers have prepared to take a strike vote several times since the beginning of the school year, the union last week agreed to review the district's latest contract offer.

The new pact would give teachers no raise this year, a 2 percent raise in 1994-95, and a 6 percent raise in 1995-96, a slight improvement over the district's original offer, according to Judith L. Oliver, the union's vice president.

Teachers "are still divided'' over whether to accept the plan, she added, but the union is expected to make a final decision later this week on whether to strike.

Vol. 13, Issue 06

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

To Address Chronic Absenteeism, Dig into the Data

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Keep Your Schools Safe and Responsive to Real Challenges

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

3 Unique Learner Profiles for Emerging Bilinguals

Effective Questioning Practices to Spur Thinking

Empower Reading Teachers with Proven Literacy PD

Student Engagement Lessons from 3 Successful Districts

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >