Rocked by Allegations of Cheating, School Issues Guidelines

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Responding to allegations of widespread cheating on tests and coursework, a top Pittsburgh high school has produced "academic integrity'' guidelines aimed at stemming future incidents.

The guidelines were released in June, shortly before The Wall Street Journal published a front-page article detailing charges by students, parents, and teachers that numerous students at Taylor Allderdice High School had offered money for homework, stolen tests, or used open dictionaries in taking college-admission tests, among other allegations.

Most of the incidents were said to have occurred during the 1990-91 school year and to have involved students who graduated from the public school this year. The students named as cheaters denied the charges or refused to comment.

The article suggested that intense pressure on Taylor Allderdice students to achieve high grades and gain admission to leading colleges had led to the academic dishonesty.

Richard Gutkind, a co-principal of the school, said the guidelines were prepared after a yearlong review by a committee of students, parents, and teachers, formed after the charges were made to school officials. He noted that the school had planned to train school-staff members on the guidelines even before the Wall Street Journal story appeared.

"These things would have happened regardless of the article,'' Mr. Gutkind said.

The new policy states that "the community of Taylor Allderdice High School will not tolerate cheating/plagiarism in any form by its students.'' It outlines procedures for investigating allegations, as well as practices--such as numbering test papers and requiring students to clear programmable calculators before taking mathematics tests--to curb incidents of cheating.

It also sets forth penalties for violators, ranging from failing an assignment to suspension.

Objections to Story

Mr. Gutkind and district officials voiced strong objections to the June 29 newspaper article.

At a news conference held the day it appeared, Richard C. Wallace Jr., Pittsburgh's superintendent of schools, denounced the story as "yellow journalism.''

"We felt it was a classic case of a mean-spirited, unfair, and unwarranted report,'' Patricia Crawford, a district spokesman, added in an interview. "And you can add irresponsible to that list.''

Ms. Crawford particularly objected to the fact that the newspaper printed the names and pictures of students who were accused of cheating.

"It's a shame they have to suffer publicly, when they may have done absolutely nothing,'' she said.

Roger B. May, a spokesman for the Journal, said the use of names was essential to the story.

"It's something we don't take lightly,'' he said. "We are concerned about journalistic ethics. We believe it is a fair and accurate story.''

Vol. 11, Issue 40, Page 27

Published in Print: August 5, 1992, as Rocked by Allegations of Cheating, School Issues Guidelines
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >