Boston Brings in Team To Revamp Special Education

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The agreement, approved in a state court last month, adds another chapter to the 16-year-old lawsuit over the adequacy of services for the more than 7,000 disabled children who attend the Boston schools.

Citing reports that criticized the way those services are managed, the families that brought the original lawsuit asked the court last year to put the special-education program into receivership.

That effort was halted after Mayor Raymond L. Flynn appointed the district's newly constituted school committee in January and the plaintiffs and school officials agreed to work out a mechanism for improving services.

"We found the new school committee was more willing to work with us on a cooperative basis'' than the old elected committee, said Susan Cole, the legal director of the Massachusetts Advocacy Center, which represents the students and parents.

Under the new agreement, approved June 22 by Middlesex Superior Court Judge Catherine A. White, a team composed of three outside consultants and three Boston special-education administrators is charged with devising a plan for improving services by Aug. 31.

The plan will be subject to revisions by Superintendent of Schools Lois Harrison-Jones. But the school system will be required to implement whatever plan is eventually agreed upon. The team will remain in place once the plan is adopted to report on its implementation.

Public Status for Drivers

In a related matter stemming from the lawsuit, Judge White also ordered school officials to make plans to require school-bus drivers transporting disabled students to become public employees by 1994.

The move is intended to end disruptions in bus services for disabled students that are caused when school-bus drivers go on strike.

But the judge turned down the plaintiffs' request to bar the city from signing a two-year transportation contract with a private bus company.

Vol. 11, Issue 40, Page 19

Published in Print: August 5, 1992, as Boston Brings in Team To Revamp Special Education
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >