'Impact Statement' for Tests Is Urged

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Any national system of assessments should require test-makers to submit an "educational-impact statement'' detailing their tests' effects on schooling, a coalition of four dozen civil-rights and education groups argued last week.

In a letter to the Congress, which is currently debating legislation to create such a system, the groups state that "the evidence shows that educational testing is more apt to be harmful than helpful.''

But, it states, if the Congress chooses to support the plan, it should also create safeguards to protect students and schools. These safeguards, the letter states, include ensuring that the assessments are based on broad national standards, but do not dictate curricula; that tests will not be used out of context; that the total amount of testing will be reduced; that students will be provided an opportunity to do well on the examinations; and that assessments rely on performance methods, not multiple-choice formats.

To ensure that the safeguards are met, the groups also argue that applicants for a national system of assessments should have to submit a statement modeled after the environmental-impact statements that government agencies and private developers are required to present for approval of construction projects.

The House Education and Labor Committee is expected this month to consider legislation that would create a mechanism for developing national education standards and a system of assessments to gauge student progress against the standards. The Senate approved such a proposal in January, and is expected this month to consider a revised version.

Vol. 11, Issue 28, Page 8

Published in Print: April 1, 1992, as 'Impact Statement' for Tests Is Urged
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >