Heads of Two Standards Panels for Science Named

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

PASADENA, Calif--The body coordinating the development of national standards for science teaching, curriculum, and assessment has chosen the heads of two of the panels that will develop the standards and expects to name the third soon.

Although an announcement has yet to be made, officials of the National Academy of Sciences said at a meeting here this month that they have chosen Karen Worth, the principal investigator with the Insights Project at the Education Development Center in Newton, Mass., to head the teaching-standards panel.

They added that Henry Heikkinen, a chemistry professor at the University of Northern Colorado, will head the curriculum-standards panel.

The official announcement, officials said, will not be made until a third person is named to head the panel that will develop standards for assessing student performance.

Because assessment is expected to be one of the most controversial areas in the standards-setting process, the search for someone to head that committee is lagging behind the others, officials said.

But sources said Richard Shavelson, the dean of the graduate school of education at the University of California at Santa Barbara and an expert in precollegiate science assessment, is the leading candidate for the post.

The issue of viable assessment, experts noted, is essential to successful science reform because what is taught in the classroom is frequently defined by what knowledge is to be tested.

"What we don't want is the wrong kind of assessment applied to science education,'' said Douglas Lapp, the executive director of the National Science Resources Center, a joint venture of the academy and the Smithsonian Institution.

A Progress Report

During a working conference on science-education reform held here by the resources center, participants heard from Kenneth Hoffman, the academy's associate executive officer for education, about the progress of the standards project.

Ms. Worth participated in the conference, and Mr. Shavelson described to the participants his efforts to help devise alternative methods of assessment.

Mr. Hoffman said the three 18-member panels will, under the direction of a governing body yet to be named, begin developing drafts during a monthlong retreat this summer in California.

The entire standards-setting process is expected to take two years.

Although scientists who attended the conference were, for the most part, initially unaware that efforts were under way to set standards, they quickly agreed that the process should include advice from scientists. (See related story, page 12.)

Mr. Hoffman also noted that, because the standards-setting process must satisfy such diverse constituencies--from President Bush to the heads of the various science-education organizations--"the whole process is infinitely more political than you can imagine.''

Vol. 11, Issue 27, Page 13

Published in Print: March 25, 1992, as Heads of Two Standards Panels for Science Named
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >