Tying Teacher Pay to Student Performance Still Rare

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Although teacher-incentive programs exist in half the states, plans such as the one in Granville County, N.C., that tie individual teacher bonuses to student performance are still relatively rare.

A national survey on teacher career ladders and other incentives, released last month by the Southern Regional Education Board, found some sort of incentive plan in place in about 25 states.

"However," the study found, "the notion of tying rewards for individual teachers to results of students is an area where few states have dared to tread."

The survey showed that states are employing a wide range of approaches. Seven states, including North Carolina, now fund career ladder projects. But four other states--all in the South--have abandoned such programs in recent years.

"If states made a commitment and provided substantial funding, the programs are still in place," said Lynn M. Cornett, the S.R.E.B.'S vice president for state services and the director of its career-ladder clearinghouse. "In the 1980's, when there was a flurry of activity, a lot of states were putting programs on the books, but they never made commitments to those programs."

Most states continue to emphasize extra pay for extra work, she said. Nine states, for example, have statewide mentor-teacher programs, the s.R.E.B. found.

More popular than bonuses tied to individual teacher performance are programs that reward entire schools or districts for improved student performance. And rather than giving teachers salary bonuses, some programs reward schools with more money for instructional purposes or other programs. The survey found that seven states provide money for school-incentive programs.

Some people may be surprised by the number of state-sponsored programs still in operation around the country, Ms. Cornett said. "You don't hear a lot about them," she said, "but many of them have become part of the fabric" of the states' education systems.

Funding Falls Short

North Carolina's experience shows the difficulty of assuring the resources needed to carry out teacher-incentive plans.

The original 1989 legislation allowing North Carolina districts to develop differentiated-pay plans called for funding to increase in yearly increments, from 2 percent of state-mandated salaries in the 1990-91 school year to 7 percent over the course of five years.

When state budget problems last year caused funding for the plans to be frozen at 2 percent, or $39 million, statewide, the legislature gave districts the option of using the money for across-the-board increases rather than differentiated pay. The Granville County district was one of 18 statewide that kept some form of differentiated pay.

Sixteen other districts are receiving a total of $38 million in state money this year as part of the Career-Development Plan, a career-ladder pilot project. Districts have had to submit plans showing how they can implement their programs with reduced funding over the next five years.

The state legislature will not convene again until the end of May, but the state board of education has already weighed in with a pay proposal. Rather than funding across-the-board increases, as the state superintendent of public instruction wants to do, the board proposes doubling the allocation for differentiated pay, to a total of $76 million. That would put the plan back on the five-year schedule set in the original legislation.

Copies of the S.R.E.B. study, "The 1991 National Survey of Incentive Programs and Career Ladders," are available for $5 each from the Southern Regional Education Board, 592 10th St., N.W., Atlanta, Ga. 30318-5790; telephone (404) 875-9211.

Vol. 11, Issue 22, Page 16

Published in Print: February 19, 1992, as Tying Teacher Pay to Student Performance Still Rare
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >