Poorly Regulated Child Care Widespread, C.D.F. Finds

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Washington--Nearly half of all children cared for outside their homes are in settings not subject to child-care licensing laws, and standards governing regulated programs are often insufficient to ensure children's "health, safety, and full development," a new report by the Children's Defense Fund has concluded.

The child-advocacy group notes in the report that more than 6 million children--including more than 2 million under age 3--spend at least part of their day in out-of-home child care.

While most states license publicly funded child-care centers, the c.d.f. says, many of the most common forms of child care are exempt from regulation or operate undetected by state agencies.

"Many states lack sufficient resources to monitor and enforce the requirements," the report adds.

Family day-care homes--nonprofit programs operated in providers' homes--care for roughly half of all children in child-care programs, with the majority serving fewer than six children, according to the c.d.f.

But the group's 50-state survey found that 22 states exempt family day-care homes serving five or fewer children from regulation.

In addition, the report says, 29 states fully or partially exempt from regulation child-care programs operated by public schools, and 13 states grant such exemptions for child-care centers run by religious institutions--which account for one-third of all child-care centers.

For programs subject to licensing, the group charges, state standards are often inadequate. For example:

Thirteen states do not require children in regulated family day-care homes to receive "basic immunizations."

Counter to the recommendations of child-care experts, 19 states allow centers to operate with five or more infants per adult, and 22 states set no limits on overall group size.

Only a quarter of the states require child-care-center staff members to have a minimum number of hours of training; 35 states require no training for family day-care providers.

Twenty-nine do not give parents the "unqualified right" to visit family day-care homes unannounced.

While many states report an "enormous increase" in the number of child-care centers subject to regulation in recent years, the report says, many report having insufficient staff and resources to monitor programs effectively. Sixteen, for example, reported having to scale back monitoring due to a lack of funds, and eight said they could not address all complaints on quality.

The report adds that few states have offered "meaningful incentives'' to improve child-care quality, either by raising staff wages or helping providers get training.

Gina C. Adams, the report's author, says substandard care is most detrimental to poor children, who are "less likely to develop strong cognitive and social skills and to be prepared for school" than those in programs of high caliber.

Arguing that child care is unlikely to improve without federal and state action, the c.d.f. urges the Congress to pass a child-care bill before adjourning for the year.

Legislation pending in a House-Senate conference committee would require only that states have standards in certain broad areas, such as adult-child ratios, and would give them three years to phase in new regulations.

Copies of "Who Knows How Safe? The Status of State Efforts to Ensure Quality Child Care" are available for $4.95 each, plus $1.50 for shipping, from c.d.f. Publications, 122 C St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001.

Vol. 10, Issue 2

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >