I.R.A. Reaffirms Opposition to State Comparisons

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

The International Reading Association has reaffirmed its opposition to state-by-state comparisons of student performance in that subject.

Acting at its annual meeting in Atlanta this month, the group adopted a resolution, similar to one adopted last year, that opposes the proliferation of testing and large-scale assessments that compare states.

"There is a sense that there is too much assessment going on now, and that comparisons will not enhance instruction," said Richard M. Long, the ira's Washington representative. "They see assessment as something done to children, not for children."

In 1992, the National Assessment of Educational Progress will conduct a pilot state-level assessment in 4th-grade reading. The results will provide the first state-by-state comparisons of reading achievement.

Roy Truby, executive staff director of the National Assessment Governing Board, said the framework for the reading assessment represents a sharp departure from previous naep tests, and added that he hoped the ira would reconsider its position and support the project.

"Although the final decisions [about participating in the state-level assessment] are normally made by chief state school officers, legislators, and governors, they can influence the decision," he said. "I consider them an important group."--rr

Vol. 09, Issue 35

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on edweek.org, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories