Column: Research

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Policymakers have not yet addressed questions about the efficacy of certain education-reform strategies that, if left unanswered, could "relegate school restructuring to the proverbial graveyard of educational fads," a new report concludes.

In "Restructuring American Schools: The Promise and the Pitfalls," Lorraine M. McDonnell, a senior political scientist with the rand Corporation, examines initiatives to decentralize authority over schooling; hold schools accountable for student performance; alter the content and process of instruction; and strengthen links between schools and the community.

The report observes that such reforms address different parts of the education system, and that "few efforts are being made to design any type of comprehensive strategy."

Moreover, it says, the relationship between the problems of poor educational performance and the solutions embodied in restructuring proposals "are not always clear or well articulated."

Although reforms are usually justified by their presumed effects on student outcomes, the benefits most often discussed are "teacher empowerment, parental choice, and public credibility," the paper states. In fact, Ms. McDonnell concludes, current research is insufficient to establish either a causal or an empirical link between the various strategies and improved student performance.

Policymakers should be able to show what changes are likely to be associated with a restructuring approach, she advises.

In addition, not enough attention has been focused on what reforms will cost and what new investments in staff retraining need to be made, the report says.

And, it notes, the "profound questions" about how public education should be governed frequently are considered only after policies are implemented.

Copies of the draft report are available for $5 each from the Institute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University, Box 174, New York City, N.Y. 10027. Checks should be payable to i.e.e. Publications.

Two psychobiologists say they have confirmed the theory that some kinds of learning actually cause physical changes in the circuitry of the brain.

Richard F. Thompson of the University of Southern California and William T. Greenough of the University of Illinois announced their findings this month after two years of experimentation.

Mr. Greenough said the apparent confirmation of the so-called "hard wiring" memory theory explains why some skills, such as riding a bicycle, are never forgotten.

The researchers said they triggered changes in the brains of test animals by conditioning them to respond to certain cues.

By planting electrodes in the brains of rabbits and rats, the researchers found that the conditioning had altered the pattern of connections between brain cells associated with the conditioned responses.

Mr. Greenough described the study as the first in a line of research that may someday yield a better understanding of human learning and learning disabilities.

The financial benefits of having a college education are increasing, while the consequences of inadequate schooling are becoming more severe, a recent university analysis asserts.

Using updated lifetime earnings figures and recent U.S. Census data, researchers at the University of Utah have concluded that a male who gets a bachelor's degree can expect lifetime earnings of about $1.9 million, about $480,000 more than a high-school graduate and $750,000 more than a dropout.

For each dollar made by male high-school graduates, male college graduates made $1.28 in 1981 and $1.39 in 1987, the analysis found.

Women with bachelor's degrees can expect to make in a lifetime about $1.15 million, nearly $300,000 more than a female high-school graduate.

Children's appraisal of the factors leading to success in sports changes as they mature and differs markedly according to sex, a new report says.

Bruce A. Watkins, a developmental psychologist and professor of sports management at the University of Michigan, posed questions about athletics to 229 children in grades 3, 6, 9, and 12 in Ann Arbor, Mich.

The survey, whose results are scheduled to appear in the December issue of Child Development, found that 3rd graders believed they could become excellent athletes merely with practice. In contrast, adolescents said athletic success results from a combination of innate ability, concentration, teamwork, and desire.

The report concludes that children are most likely to drop out of sports between the ages of 11 and 13, when they start to compare themselves based on their physical ability but are unable to see the importance to athletics of mental skills such as concentration.

Competitiveness actually may work against these children, prompting them to give up on sports when they do not excel at them, Mr. Watkins said.

Adolescent boys surveyed were more likely than girls to credit athletic success to natural ability. Girls were found more likely to credit such success to external sources, such as parents, siblings, and peers, thereby highlighting the importance of outside support in keeping them in sports.--ab & ps

Vol. 09, Issue 13

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >